[Developers] sd_phase question

[dave fournier]

On 11-09-20 10:50 AM, John Sibert wrote:


Hard to say without the code. a small example would be good.
ONly idea is that there is a separate sd_phase around.
Note that sd_phase returns initial_params::sd_phase


   static int sd_phase(void)
  {
     return initial_params::sd_phase;
  }


> Why do sd_phase() and sd_phase return different values? This may be a 
> lex issue.
>
> From one of my ADMB applications:
> line 655, file linux-gnu/tagest.cpp, sd_phase() = 0, sd_phase = 1
>
> John
>