[Developers] Software development process

Wed Apr 4 11:26:37 PDT 2012

All,

Please checkout  the follow link:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process

I recommend that we develop a formal and concise software development plan, it will make our work much easier!

Matthew

On Apr 4, 2012, at 12:59 PM, developers-request at admb-project.org wrote:

> Send Developers mailing list submissions to
>    developers at admb-project.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    developers-request at admb-project.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    developers-owner at admb-project.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Developers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Borland compiler no longer supported (Mark Maunder)
>   2. Check Release procedure (Johnoel Ancheta)
>   3. Re: Check Release procedure (John Sibert)
>   4. Re: Check Release procedure (Arni Magnusson)
>   5. Re: Check Release procedure (Ian Taylor)
>   6. Re: Check Release procedure (Arni Magnusson)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:09:00 +0000
> From: Mark Maunder <mmaunder at iattc.org>
> To: "developers at admb-project.org" <developers at admb-project.org>
> Cc: "users at admb-project.org" <users at admb-project.org>
> Subject: [Developers] Borland compiler no longer supported
> Message-ID:
>    <339913E1960AE142A9373DFCD849F3DA1E47BA4D at mail1.lajolla.iattc.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> The ADMB team has decided to no longer support the Borland compiler. Users who wish to continue using the Borland compiler can always attempt to compile the source code and work from that.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> Mark Maunder
> 
> IATTC fall workshop: Using Oceanography for Fisheries Stock Assessment and Management
> 11-14 October 2011, La Jolla, CA
> http://www.fisheriesstockassessment.com/TikiWiki/tiki-index.php?page=Using+Oceanography+for+Fisheries+Stock+Assessment+and+Management+2011
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Head of the Stock Assessment Program
> Inter-American  Tropical Tuna Commission
> 
> President
> ADMB Foundation
> 
> 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive
> La Jolla, CA, 92037-1508, USA
> 
> Tel: (858) 546-7027
> Fax: (858) 546-7133
> mmaunder at iattc.org<mailto:mmaunder at iattc.org>
> http://www.fisheriesstockassessment.com/TikiWiki/tiki-index.php?page=Mark+Maunder
> 
> Visit the AD Model Builder project at
> http://admb-project.org/
> 
> See the following website for information on fisheries stock assessment http://www.fisheriesstockassessment.com/
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20120403/6e2deb20/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:30:24 -1000
> From: Johnoel Ancheta <johnoel at hawaii.edu>
> To: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: [Developers] Check Release procedure
> Message-ID:
>    <CAJMx2XXxHGJbnOSQS29BPTk3XpdbdykO9jAXUM+HJX3Z3NdK5w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> http://admb-project.org/developers/admb-release-procedure
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20120403/83e3df45/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:13:43 -1000
> From: John Sibert <sibert at hawaii.edu>
> To: Johnoel Ancheta <johnoel at hawaii.edu>
> Cc: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Developers] Check Release procedure
> Message-ID:
>    <CAKKKzKgckQESWZ1ueE5RXdBn59yfV8oCrk-dmRBWCg7wBb3jjA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> It looks rather formal.
> 
> How frequently would there be a new release?
> On Apr 3, 2012 6:30 PM, "Johnoel Ancheta" <johnoel at hawaii.edu> wrote:
> 
>> http://admb-project.org/developers/admb-release-procedure
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developers mailing list
>> Developers at admb-project.org
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>> 
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20120404/bbc8359e/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:49:43 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is>
> To: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Developers] Check Release procedure
> Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204041637260.6630 at hafstokkur.hafro.is>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> I have updated the heading to "Annual Release", and added a couple of 
> explanatory sentences at the top and bottom of the page.
> 
> Thanks for posting this very useful reference, Johnoel.
> 
> Arni
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, John Sibert wrote:
> 
>> It looks rather formal.
>> 
>> How frequently would there be a new release?
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>> On Wed, 3 Ap 2012, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>> 
>>> http://admb-project.org/developers/admb-release-procedure
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:55:53 -0700
> From: Ian Taylor <ian.taylor at noaa.gov>
> To: Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is>
> Cc: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Developers] Check Release procedure
> Message-ID:
>    <CAOUH9r6-=0-3CaDJhgdQom1fSzhvxnPKOpXiJHAMisep1evarQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I like the formality and the fact that this is written down.
> In a case where a bug is found after release, what would happen: a repeat
> of the full procedure, a shorter testing phase for the bug fix, or what?
> -Ian
> 
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is> wrote:
> 
>> I have updated the heading to "Annual Release", and added a couple of
>> explanatory sentences at the top and bottom of the page.
>> 
>> Thanks for posting this very useful reference, Johnoel.
>> 
>> Arni
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, John Sibert wrote:
>> 
>> It looks rather formal.
>>> 
>>> How frequently would there be a new release?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> On Wed, 3 Ap 2012, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>>> 
>>> http://admb-project.org/**developers/admb-release-**procedure<http://admb-project.org/developers/admb-release-procedure>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Developers mailing list
>> Developers at admb-project.org
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/**mailman/listinfo/developers<http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers>
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20120404/da17e93c/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:59:37 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is>
> To: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Developers] Check Release procedure
> Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204041657310.6630 at hafstokkur.hafro.is>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> See "Other Releases" on same page. Formally, those will follow a strictly 
> ad-hoc procedure.
> 
> Arni
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Ian Taylor wrote:
> 
>> I like the formality and the fact that this is written down. In a case 
>> where a bug is found after release, what would happen: a repeat of the 
>> full procedure, a shorter testing phase for the bug fix, or what?
>> 
>> -Ian
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have updated the heading to "Annual Release", and added a couple of
>>> explanatory sentences at the top and bottom of the page.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for posting this very useful reference, Johnoel.
>>> 
>>> Arni
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, John Sibert wrote:
>>> 
>>> It looks rather formal.
>>>> 
>>>> How frequently would there be a new release?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> On Wed, 3 Ap 2012, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> http://admb-project.org/**developers/admb-release-**procedure<http://admb-project.org/developers/admb-release-procedure>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Developers mailing list
>>> Developers at admb-project.org
>>> http://lists.admb-project.org/**mailman/listinfo/developers<http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers>
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> 
> 
> End of Developers Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1
> *****************************************