[Developers] Software development process
dave fournier
davef at otter-rsch.com
Wed Apr 4 13:13:18 PDT 2012
On 12-04-04 01:08 PM, Arni Magnusson wrote:
I've hard all this bullshit so many times before. You take a bunch of
people who don't know what they are doing and form a committee. The you
tell the committee to formulate a complete design plan.
Six months later you put it in a nice document. A year later you start
over. If open source needs this
maybe that is what's wrong with open source.
> Thanks, Matthew, for stirring our minds.
>
> As the ADMB Project grows (number of people, number of features,
> number of bugs, etc.), this may be a good time to think about whether
> we can benefit from adopting certain software development methodologies.
>
> You and Johnoel know more about this than the others. It sounds like
> you are not suggesting any specific methodologies at this point, just
> encouraging everyone to read and think about them.
>
> ---
>
> Generally, the ADMB Project follows the methodology known as
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboy_coding
>
> The main advantages are light overhead and fun. As most of us
> contribute to ADMB in our free time, it must be fun. Cowboy coding is
> at one extreme, and at the other extreme we have Dilbert coding, with
> overly complex and vague methodologies that keep changing. The ADMB
> Project is moving only slightly towards the middle ground. Dilbert in
> chaps?
>
> Automated testing (Buildbot and unit tests) is a good example, where
> Johnoel has radically improved the development process - without
> adding any burden or requirements on the developers.
>
> The annual developers' workshop is also a key "methodology", where we
> make sure things are moving in a sensible direction, in a sensible
> way. They also mark the beginning of the release procedure, generate
> new ideas, and add to the fun factor.
>
> Version control is a given, and SVN is what cowboys ride. Actually, I
> have one suggestion related to ADMB development methodology: to
> install ViewVC, so we can browse and diff the repository using a web
> browser. My sysadmin has deployed it here at Hafro with success. This
> is what it looks like:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/
> http://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php/pkg/?root=glmmadmb
>
> Thinking about potentially useful development methods/tools doesn't
> hurt. My feeling is that the ADMB Project is doing reasonably well,
> with developers enthusiastically contributing to different aspects of
> the project. Johnoel serves a key role, including quality control, and
> is doing a great job.
>
> Arni
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Matthew Supernaw wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Please checkout the follow link:
>>
>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process
>>
>> I recommend that we develop a formal and concise software development
>> plan, it will make our work much easier!
>>
>> Matthew
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
More information about the Developers
mailing list