[Developers] admb threading

[Matthew Supernaw]

Which book,  "Concurrent Programming for Procedural Programmers"?

Anyway,  lets step through the logic of:

prevariable& operator+(const prevariable& v1, const prevariable& v2)


you have a call to:

gradient_structure::GRAD_STACK1->set_gradient_stack4(void(*),double*,double*double*)

and then:

default_evaluation4()

Why can't there be a mutex lock on gradient_structure?





On Dec 4, 2012, at 3:00 PM, developers-request at admb-project.org wrote:

> Send Developers mailing list submissions to
> 	developers at admb-project.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	developers-request at admb-project.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	developers-owner at admb-project.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Developers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: admb threading (dave fournier)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:56:50 -0800
> From: dave fournier <davef at otter-rsch.com>
> To: developers at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Developers] admb threading
> Message-ID: <50BE5582.3000002 at otter-rsch.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Read the book!
> 
> A way to synchronize is in my example referred to earlier. Of course 
> that is
> just for dvariables. For df1b2 variables there is a lot more structure, 
> but the ideas
> would be the same.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> 
> 
> End of Developers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 10
> ******************************************