[Developers] Request documentation help
dave fournier
davef at otter-rsch.com
Wed Feb 12 09:55:37 PST 2014
On 14-02-10 10:39 AM, Ian Taylor - NOAA Federal wrote:
Perhaps an example is needed.
At the Seattle workshop (and at the Honolulu workshop and at ...)
I showed how you could define a set of print functions call mp()
(shorter is better for names here,
so that gdb users (included ddd) could use a command like
call mp(M)
to print out say a vector or matrix in the debugger. Extend this to
call mpc(M,4)
to print out the 4'th column of a matrix M.
all this could be extended to all types in an intuitive manner etc.
To my knowledge nothing has been done with this. I think it is a more
useful idea than
puking out vast amounts of mindless documentation.
Just a thought.
> Hi All,
> I wasn't at the most recent Developer's workshop in Reykjavik, but the
> report from that workshop
> http://www.admb-project.org/developers/workshop/reykjavik-2013/meeting-report-1 seems
> relevant to this discussion. It says "Ongoing improvement of ADMB
> documentation has been a long-standing priority area of the ADMB
> project" (page 9), and lists "Add new Doxygen comments" among the
> "Priorities for Documentation" along with things like "Update manuals"
> and clean up the website (page 12).
>
> If the ADMB Developer's Workshop Report isn't a good source for
> learning about the ADMB Projects's priorities, what is?
> -Ian
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:07 PM, John Sibert <sibert at hawaii.edu
> <mailto:sibert at hawaii.edu>> wrote:
>
> I couldn't agree more. Documenting every function in every source
> file would be a tragic waste of time and would not lead to a
> better user experience. The emphasis on documentation may come
> from some nameless NOAA bureaucrat ignorant of the fact that there
> is already a lot API and other documentation. The ADMB API
> documentation
> (http://www.admb-project.org/documentation/api/index.html) has a
> nicely indexed list of commonly used functions on the "Function
> Reference" tab. Classes and global functions are also indexed, and
> there is a Search box.
>
> The documentation seems to grow as more people contribute. All of
> the contributed libraries are well documented. Steve Martel and
> others have added Dox. Johnoel was trying to encourage other
> developers to contribute as well. I tend to add Doxygen stuff when
> a question pops up in an email or when I get curious about how
> something actually works. I would encourage others to do the same.
>
>
> John Sibert
> Emeritus Researcher, SOEST
> University of Hawaii at Manoa
> Honolulu HI (GMT-10)
> 808-294-3842 <tel:808-294-3842>
>
> Visit the ADMB project http://admb-project.org/
>
> On 02/07/2014 06:13 PM, dave fournier wrote:
>
>
>
> Well I know a bit about a lot of functions, but this seems
> like make work to me.
>
> Could you give me an example of a function for which more
> documentation would
> suddenly make the sun shine?
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org <mailto:Developers at admb-project.org>
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org <mailto:Developers at admb-project.org>
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20140212/8ca1a6ec/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Developers
mailing list