[Developers] Template functions and documentation

dave fournier davef at otter-rsch.com
Fri Jun 27 11:55:37 PDT 2014


On 06/27/2014 11:39 AM, Mark Maunder wrote:


Mark,

If it is linear for young fish and vonb for older fish then the linear 
part is only important in so much as
it helps determine the length of the first age class for which the von b 
is used. So one could still parameterize the model as

     l_1,   l_mid,  l_n, and rho     where

l_1 is the mean length of the first age class, l_n is the mean length of 
the last age class and l_mid is the mean length of the first
age class for which the VB is used.

All this will also work for Richards etc.  I suppose I'm being difficult 
but the net is full of people fitting these curves
with bad parameterization and having trouble.  People are taught to 
parameterizae their curves with the parameters
of interest rather than use stable parameterizations and then solve for 
the parametres of interest as dependent variables.

a major problme is that r offers no support for this superior approach 
especially when it comes to random effects models.
Just another reason why R sucks.

     Dave






> Dave,
>
> The point is that the asymptotic length is controlled by the shape of 
> the growth curve and the fit to the young and intermediate aged fish. 
> For example, if you fit a vonB only to young fish that show linear 
> growth you get a very large Linf. The more flexible Richards curve 
> does better, but I don't think it bends over fast enough for the data 
> I have. I have created a composite growth model that is linear for 
> young fish and vonB for old fish, but I was wondering if there is a 
> better model out there that I don't know about.
>
> Mark
>
> *From:*dave fournier [mailto:davef at otter-rsch.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 27, 2014 11:34 AM
> *To:* Mark Maunder; developers at admb-project.org
> *Cc:* Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva; Carolina Minte-Vera
> *Subject:* Re: [Developers] Template functions and documentation
>
> On 06/27/2014 11:29 AM, Mark Maunder wrote:
>
> OK,  so the asymptotic length is important.  What is your point?
>
>     Dave
>
>     Thanks Dave,
>
>     We will probably use a reparameterization like this when we do the
>     analysis. Right now I am trying to get the function coding
>     structure sorted out before I write too much code.
>
>     If you have a growth curve that is quite linear for the first few
>     ages and then bends over quickly, that would be useful. We have
>     been applying the Richards curve, but I think we might need to do
>     better. The issue is that the asymptotic length is quite important
>     when fitting to length composition data, but we often don't have
>     much age (or tagging) data for old fish. So, the asymptotic length
>     is controlled by the shape of the growth curve and the fit to the
>     young and intermediate aged fish.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Mark
>
>     *From:*dave fournier [mailto:davef at otter-rsch.com]
>     *Sent:* Friday, June 27, 2014 11:11 AM
>     *To:* Mark Maunder; developers at admb-project.org
>     <mailto:developers at admb-project.org>
>     *Cc:* Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva; Carolina Minte-Vera
>     *Subject:* Re: [Developers] Template functions and documentation
>
>     On 06/27/2014 11:04 AM, Mark Maunder wrote:
>
>     Its hard to believe that Schnute and I figured out how to do this
>     properly almost 34 years ago
>     using punch cards on a machine with 18K user memory. Someone
>     really should figure out how to teach
>     people the importance of parameterizing nonlinear models in a
>     stable fashion.
>
>
>
>
>         Hi developers,
>
>         I am in the process or putting together a model that will be
>         used to evaluate several growth equations so I thought I
>         better try to use the ADMB project "approved" approach for
>         writing the functions. Below is a template function and
>         documentation for the von Bertalanffy growth equation. I would
>         appreciate any advice on doing this "correctly".
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Mark
>
>         /**
>
>         \defgroup CONTRIB Contributed libraries
>
>         */
>
>         /**
>
>         \ingroup CONTRIB
>
>         \defgroup CAPAM CAPAM created functions
>
>         */
>
>         #include <admodel.h>
>
>         /**  von Bertalanffy growth equation; constant objects.
>
>           \ingroup CAPAM
>
>           \brief Calculate the length from a given age based on the
>         von Bertalanffy equation. Written by Mark Maunder.
>
>           \param age age of individual, \f$a\f$.
>
>           \param Linf asymptotic length, \f$L_inf\f$.
>
>           \param K growth rate, \f$K\f$.
>
>           \param t0 age at zero length, \f$t_0\f$.
>
>           \return length predicted length of individual.
>         \f$L_inf*(1-exp(-K*(a-t0)))\f$.
>
>           */
>
>         template <typename type1, typename type1>
>
>         //can have multiple types so that they are used below in
>         variable definitions, they can differ between function calls,
>         but remain the same within a function call
>
>         //type1 is probably a long
>
>         //type2 is probably a dvariable (either a model parameter
>         (Linf K t0) or a derived variable (length))
>
>         //may need a type3, which is a dvar_vector if age and length
>         are vectors, where type 1 will be a vector
>
>         type1 vonB(const type1 &age, const type2 &Linf, const type2
>         &K, const type2 &t0)
>
>         {
>
>           type2 length = Linf*(1.-mfexp(-K*(age-t0)));
>
>           return (length);
>
>         }
>
>         //is length a bad word to use
>
>         //do we use ingroup for both groups and subgroups in doxygen
>         documentation
>
>         //should we use mfexp?
>
>         //what if age and length are vectors, but age is a vector and
>         length is a dvar_vector, do we need to overload the type with
>         one with three variable types
>
>         //I couldn't work out how to put in the detailed description
>
>         //The equations did not work on my computer
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Developers mailing list
>
>         Developers at admb-project.org  <mailto:Developers at admb-project.org>
>
>         http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20140627/af262001/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Developers mailing list