[ADMB Users] indexing with a 3-years-lag
dave fournier
otter at otter-rsch.com
Tue Dec 7 00:12:04 PST 2010
Previous message:
[ADMB Users] indexing with a 3-years-lag
Next message:
[ADMB Users] indexing with a 3-years-lag
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Look at the valid indices for rec_m3. Try rec_m3=rec.sub(3,49).shift(1);
Previous message:
[ADMB Users] indexing with a 3-years-lag
Next message:
[ADMB Users] indexing with a 3-years-lag
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Users mailing list