[ADMB Users] Retrospective analysis
Luis Ridao
luridao at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 08:32:40 PDT 2010
Hi,
Following Steve's approach I set a "nyrs_r" variable and made sure that the
data dimensions agreed.
I initially encountered plenty of errors (solved by removing the indexes in
the data, e.g. C=elem_prod(elem_div(F,Z).....);
instead of C=elem_prod(elem_div(F(1,nyrs),Z(1,nyrs)).......);) and although
the compilation and building finally passed the checks
the running of the model failed:
Incompatible bounds in dvar_vector elem_prod(_CONST dvar_vector& v1,_CONST
dvar_vector& v2)
Process catage6109_rec_mod_ret exited abnormally with code 1
I guess it is a problem with the dimensions but I just can't see it.
Attached are the .tpl and .dat files.
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Steve Martell <s.martell at fisheries.ubc.ca>wrote:
> Luis,
> There are many different ways to do this without having to create separate
> reduced data sets.
>
> One approach would be to include the number of retrospective years at the
> top of the data file, and read this along with all the other data. Then at
> the very botttom of the data section (after all of the data has been read
> in), modify your model dimensions by the number of retrospective years. For
> example:
>
> DATA_SECTION
>
> int_int retyrs; //number of retrospective years
> int_int nyrs; //total number of years
>
> //... read the rest of the data.
>
> //... now modify the model dimensions at the end of the data section.
> !! nyrs = nyrs - retyrs;
>
> Note that you'll have to make sure your calculations in the
> PROCEDURE_SECTION etc. that are based on the data have the correct
> dimensions if retyrs > 0. For example, you'll have to be explicit in
> calculating residuals:
>
> dvar_vector pred_ct(1,nyrs);
> resid = log(elem_div(obs_ct,pred_ct));
>
> //should be:
> resid = log(elem_div(obs_ct(1,nyrs),pred_ct(1,nyrs)));
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 2010-11-01, at 9:45 AM, Luis Ridao wrote:
>
> ADMB-help,
>
> I was wondering how to implement a retrospective analysis of a given
> catch-at-age model.
> The straightforward but also the slowest approach might be to shorten the
> data file and adjust
> the parameter section accordingly but I guess there must be a way to get
> around this
> (maybe some shell scripting?)
>
> Is there anyone out there who has faced a similar issue?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Luis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> Steve Martell
> s.martell at fisheries.ubc.ca
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101102/9bab1457/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: catage6109_rec_mod_retADMBlist.dat
Type: application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig
Size: 14184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101102/9bab1457/attachment.dat>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: catage6109_rec_mod_retADMBlist.tpl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6595 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101102/9bab1457/attachment.obj>
More information about the Users
mailing list