[ADMB Users] old compilation problem, new version (10.1)
Evan Cooch
evan.cooch at gmail.com
Fri Apr 15 18:26:42 PDT 2011
Well, thanks -- that seems to have moved things along. At least, now I
have different FAILS:
configure:2062: $? = 0
configure:2065: test -s conftest.o
configure:2068: $? = 0
configure:2086: result: none needed
configure:2104: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
conftest.c:2: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__'
before 'me'
configure:2110: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| #ifndef __cplusplus
| choke me
| #endif
configure:2295: checking for g++
configure:2311: found /usr/bin/g++
configure:2321: result: g++
configure:2337: checking for C++ compiler version
configure:2340: g++ --version </dev/null >&5
g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
and
configure:2524: $? = 0
configure:2527: test -s conftest.o
configure:2530: $? = 0
configure:2556: g++ -c -g -O2 conftest.cc >&5
conftest.cc: In function 'int main()':
conftest.cc:13: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
configure:2562: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
|
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "ADMB"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "admb"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "10.0"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "ADMB 10.0"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "users at admb-project.org"
| /* end confdefs.h. */
and
configure:2724: result: g++ -E
configure:2748: g++ -E conftest.cc
configure:2754: $? = 0
configure:2786: g++ -E conftest.cc
conftest.cc:12:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
configure:2792: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
|
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "ADMB"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "admb"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "10.0"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "ADMB 10.0"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "users at admb-project.org"
| #ifdef __cplusplus
| extern "C" void std::exit (int) throw (); using std::exit;
| #endif
| /* end confdefs.h. */
| #include <ac_nonexistent.h>
configure:2836: checking for egrep
configure:2846: result: grep -E
configure:2851: checking for ANSI C header files
configure:2876: g++ -c -g -O2 conftest.cc >&5
configure:2882: $? = 0
configure:2886: test -z
and
onfigure:3469: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.cc -lfl >&5
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libfl.a(libmain.o):
In function `main':
(.text+0x7): undefined reference to `yylex'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure:3475: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* A lexical scanner generated by flex*/
|
| /* Scanner skeleton version:
| * $Header: /home/daffy/u0/vern/flex/RCS/flex.skl,v 2.91 96/09/10
16:58:48 vern Exp $
| */
|
| #define FLEX_SCANNER
| #define YY_FLEX_MAJOR_VERSION 2
| #define YY_FLEX_MINOR_VERSION 5
On 4/15/2011 8:48 PM, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
> Rebuild the configure file.
>
> $ make --directory=scripts/configure
>
>
> On 4/15/11 2:38 PM, Evan Cooch wrote:
>> Alas, no look. Took latest admb-10.1.zip archive, extracted it, and
>> tried ./configure with the 'native' (non-tweaked) scripts, and
>> config.log still shows the same FAIL(s) -- for example:
>>
>> conftest.cpp:9:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
>> configure:3169: $? = 1
>> configure: failed program was:
>> | /* confdefs.h */
>> | #define PACKAGE_NAME "ADMB"
>> | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "admb"
>> | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "10.0"
>> | #define PACKAGE_STRING "ADMB 10.0"
>> | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "users at admb-project.org"
>> | #define PACKAGE_URL ""
>> | /* end confdefs.h. */
>> | #include <ac_nonexistent.h>
>> configure:3194: result: g++ -E
>>
>>
>> On 4/15/2011 3:34 PM, bigA wrote:
>>> Hi Evan,
>>> Have you tried the untweaked scripts? In version 10.0 there was a
>>> bug in the script that produced the compilation scripts. That was
>>> fixed in version 10.1, I have successfully compiled and installed
>>> 10.1 without any tweaking of the compilation scripts.
>>> Best!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Evan Cooch <evan.cooch at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:evan.cooch at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, with the assistance of several folks on the list, who
>>> provided a hacked configure and GNUmakefile.in script
>>> (attached), I was able to successfully compile ADMB 10.0 for my
>>> various CentOS (5.5) boxes. However, when I tried the same
>>> compile sequence, using the 'tweaked' scripts, with the 10.1
>>> source, I ended up with the same FAIL during configure that I
>>> did initially with 10.0. In the config.log, I see things like:
>>>
>>> configure:3169: $? = 1
>>> configure: failed program was:
>>> | /* confdefs.h */
>>> | #define PACKAGE_NAME "ADMB"
>>> | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "admb"
>>> | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "10.0"
>>> | #define PACKAGE_STRING "ADMB 10.0"
>>> | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "users at admb-project.org"
>>> <mailto:users at admb-project.org>
>>> | #define PACKAGE_URL ""
>>> | /* end confdefs.h. */
>>> | #include <ac_nonexistent.h>
>>> configure:3194: result: /usr/bin/g++44 -E
>>> configure:3214: /usr/bin/g++44 -E conftest.cpp
>>> configure:3214: $? = 0
>>> configure:3228: /usr/bin/g++44 -E conftest.cpp
>>> conftest.cpp:9:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or
>>> directory
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I *think* that there is something in the tweaked scripts
>>> that needs to be re-tweaked for the 10.1 source. I'd be happy to
>>> take a stab at it myself, but probably more efficient to let the
>>> 'smart' folks out there suggest/make the changes (or suggest
>>> other fixes). Given that CentOS is basically RHEL, and given
>>> that RH does have a non-trivial market share, perhaps it would
>>> be worth adding something to the config script to detect the
>>> distro, and self-tweak as needed?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
>>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110415/d62a9bd4/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list