[ADMB Users] Over-dispersed Mixed Effects Model Syntax in R
Dave Robichaud
drobichaud at lgl.com
Tue Oct 4 17:50:57 PDT 2011
Hello admb'ers.
I am having trouble interpreting the help files for glmm.admb in R.
I had a perfectly good model in lmer:
mCO1 = lmer(CO ~ Treat*Week + (1|Loc), family=poisson, data=dtr)
But I now see that my data are overdispersed, so I do not think poisson
is the appropriate family. I looked extensively on the web, and I see
that lmer will not accept family = quasipoisson or family =
negative.binomial. Thus, I am once again shopping around for an
appropriate analysis.
Now, I have stumbled upon the glmmADMB package, which claims to be more
robust than glmmPQL. I like that nested models can be compared (e.g.,
anova(fit2,fit)), but can't figure out what "group" means, or how to
write the syntax for my command.
Can you help??
I should describe my data in more detail. I have the following columns:
Loc Treat Week CO
1 Control 1 10
2 Control 1 12
3 Control 1 0
4 Control 1 5
5 Modified 1 10
6 Modified 1 6
7 Modified 1 7
8 Modified 1 8
9 Modified 1 9
10 Modified 1 10
11 Modified 1 11
12 Modified 1 12
13 Modified 1 13
... (9 weeks of data omitted to save space)
1 Control 11 9
2 Control 11 8
3 Control 11 3
4 Control 11 6
5 Modified 11 9
6 Modified 11 6
7 Modified 11 5
8 Modified 11 10
9 Modified 11 2
10 Modified 11 4
11 Modified 11 6
12 Modified 11 9
13 Modified 11 2
From this, you will see that I have 4 Control sites and 7 Modified
sites that are measured each week. All 13 locations have different
names, and Location is a random variable. Location is a random variable.
My main goal is to look for an effect of Treatment. But if there is a
significant Week x Treatment interaction, I would examine the effect of
Habitat separately for each Week.
Hopefully, the above helps to clarify my situation.
Thanks very much
Dave
More information about the Users
mailing list