[ADMB Users] crappy software

[Ben Bolker]

On 11-11-01 12:13 PM, dave fournier wrote:
> OK at some point sure try bugs  But the first issue is if R really sucks
> at this
> because a lot of its users presumably use this stupid test (I would
> use likelihood ratio but that is another issue).  So first one wants a
> really clear and
> correct comparison of R with something that does better. (SAS I don't
> have and
> the R gurus will mumble about lack of source code etc anyway.)
> 
> So lets get a nice clear correct example based on Zhang et al.

  Hear, hear.

  If I can I will see if I can get access to do some SAS batch runs --
it may not be worth the effort it would take me to figure out how to do
it ... my main interest in this would be to try to figure out how/why
the estimates for the (non-simulated) data sets are different.


> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users