[ADMB Users] estimation of random effects correlations
bbolker at gmail.com
Tue May 7 08:59:37 PDT 2013
On 13-05-07 03:46 AM, Mollie Brooks wrote:
> Hi Kristian,
> The default is to fit uncorrelated random effects (a diagonal
> variance-covariance matrix), but it appears that you can fit them with a
> full variance-covariance matrix using the corStruct argument. I can not
> testify to how well this has been tested.
> a string specifying the covariance structure of the random effects
> vector. Two types of covariance matrices are currently
> implemented: |"diag"| (diagonal matrix) and |"full"| (positive definite
> matrix with all elements being estimated).
This is **NOT** working yet. I'm hoping to have it working soon.
> Mollie Brooks, PhD
> Postdoctoral Researcher, Population Ecology Research Group, Ozgul
> Lab, http://www.popecol.org
> Institute of Evolutionary Biology & Environmental Studies, University of
> On 7 May 2013, at 9:39 AM, Kristian Kleinke <kmkleinke at gmail.com
> <mailto:kmkleinke at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> just a short question I've been trying to find an answer to:
>> am I correct, that glmmadmb() cannot estimate correlations between
>> random effects?
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
More information about the Users