[ADMB Users] Help test admb-11.2

[Johnoel Ancheta]

Hi Tom,

Thank you for testing and confirming the new version is faster for your
model.
It is greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Johnoel

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tom Wainwright <thomas.wainwright at noaa.gov>
wrote:
>
> Johnoel,
>
> You also asked about runtime speeds, so I did a quick comparison on a
> random-effects model I'm currently working on. I have three versions of
> ADMB installed as of today: 11.1 installed from source, 11.2pre installed
> from the intel 64bit binary, and 11.2pre installed from source.  I built
> and ran the model 3 times with each compiler, with these results:
>
> 1) ADMB 11.1 built from source (g++ 4.4.7):
>
> BUILD:
> $ /usr/bin/time admb -r euly
> 0.67user 0.03system 0:00.73elapsed
> 0.67user 0.05system 0:00.75elapsed
> 0.64user 0.03system 0:00.71elapsed
>
> RUN:
> $ /usr/bin/time ./euly
> 7.23user 1.17system 0:08.41elapsed
> 7.25user 1.17system 0:08.43elapsed
> 7.29user 1.14system 0:08.44elapsed
>
> 2) ADMB 11.2pre prebuilt binary admb-11.2pre-centos6-intel2013-64bit.zip
>
> BUILD:
> $ /usr/bin/time admb11.2 -r euly
> 0.66user 0.05system 0:00.74elapsed 96%CPU
> 0.66user 0.05system 0:00.74elapsed
> 0.64user 0.04system 0:00.71elapsed
>
> RUN:
> $ /usr/bin/time ./euly
> 7.60user 1.19system 0:08.79elapsed
> 7.60user 1.16system 0:08.77elapsed
> 7.28user 1.17system 0:08.45elapsed
>
> 3) ADMB 11.2pre built from source (g++ 4.4.7):
>
> BUILD:
> $ /usr/bin/time ~/tmp/admb/admb -r euly
> 0.64user 0.03system 0:00.70elapsed
> 0.65user 0.04system 0:00.72elapsed
> 0.64user 0.05system 0:00.72elapsed
>
> RUN:
> $ /usr/bin/time ./euly
> 6.84user 1.22system 0:08.07elapsed
> 6.89user 1.20system 0:08.10elapsed
> 7.22user 1.20system 0:08.43elapsed
>
> All three versions are comparable on build times, but 11.2 built from
> source seems a bit faster in execution than 11.1 (Hooray!). 11.2pre from
> binary is slowest.
>
> System:
> Linux 2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64
> Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 (3.40 GHz)
> g++ (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)
>
>   Tom Wainwright
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Tom Wainwright <
> thomas.wainwright at noaa.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Tested on my CentOS system:
>>   Linux 2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64
>>   g++ (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)
>>
>> 1) admb-11.2pre-centos6-intel2013-64bit.zip installed and cleanly built a
>> few examples and recent projects.
>>
>> 2) I had a boring conference call this afternoon, so also did a source
>> install. Built cleanly (except for a few type-conversion warnings), built
>> and ran "simple" cleanly.
>>
>> Seems fine. Didn't test any new features.
>>
>>   Tom Wainwright
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Johnoel Ancheta <johnoel at hawaii.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I need to get some feedback.  Can someone test out the
>>> prerelease?
>>>
>>> http://www.admb-project.org/downloads/admb-11.2pre
>>>
>>> If there is no issues, the admb-11.2 will release next week.
>>>
>>> Johnoel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at admb-project.org
>>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tom Wainwright
>>
>> Research Fisheries Biologist
>>
>> Newport Research Station
>>
>> Northwest Fisheries Science Center
>>
>> National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
>>
>> www.nwfsc.noaa.gov
>> <http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/research/divisions/fed/climatechange.cfm>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> The contents of this message are mine personally and do not
>> necessarily reflect any position of the Government or the
>> National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Tom Wainwright
>
> Research Fisheries Biologist
>
> Newport Research Station
>
> Northwest Fisheries Science Center
>
> National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
>
> www.nwfsc.noaa.gov
> <http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/research/divisions/fed/climatechange.cfm>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> The contents of this message are mine personally and do not
> necessarily reflect any position of the Government or the
> National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141218/d13fed23/attachment-0001.html>