<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1">So, with the assistance of several folks on the
list, who provided a hacked configure and GNUmakefile.in script
(attached), I was able to successfully compile ADMB 10.0 for my
various CentOS (5.5) boxes. However, when I tried the same compile
sequence, using the 'tweaked' scripts, with the 10.1 source, I
ended up with the same FAIL during configure that I did initially
with 10.0. In the config.log, I see things like:<br>
<br>
configure:3169: $? = 1<br>
configure: failed program was:<br>
| /* confdefs.h */<br>
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "ADMB"<br>
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "admb"<br>
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "10.0"<br>
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "ADMB 10.0"<br>
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:users@admb-project.org">"users@admb-project.org"</a><br>
| #define PACKAGE_URL ""<br>
| /* end confdefs.h. */<br>
| #include <ac_nonexistent.h><br>
configure:3194: result: /usr/bin/g++44 -E<br>
configure:3214: /usr/bin/g++44 -E conftest.cpp<br>
configure:3214: $? = 0<br>
configure:3228: /usr/bin/g++44 -E conftest.cpp<br>
conftest.cpp:9:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or
directory<br>
<br>
<br>
So, I *think* that there is something in the tweaked scripts that
needs to be re-tweaked for the 10.1 source. I'd be happy to take a
stab at it myself, but probably more efficient to let the 'smart'
folks out there suggest/make the changes (or suggest other
fixes). Given that CentOS is basically RHEL, and given that RH
does have a non-trivial market share, perhaps it would be worth
adding something to the config script to detect the distro, and
self-tweak as needed?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance...<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>