[Developers] Request documentation help

dave fournier davef at otter-rsch.com
Thu Feb 13 16:55:33 PST 2014


On 14-02-13 04:38 PM, John Sibert wrote:


It means that when I looked for it in my 11.1 (release) code it did not 
seem to be there.
since that is documented as the current "release" I guess it is the 
current "release".

> Chris' gdbprint code has been available for use for some time. 
> According to the Redmine repository information 
> (http://www.admb-project.org/redmine/projects/issues/repository/changes/trunk/contrib/gdbprintlib/gdbprintlib.cpp), 
> it was first added to the repository June 17, 2012, modified and 
> documented on June 19, and verified on all platforms on June 25.
>
> I have no idea if it is an a "release" (whatever that means).
>
> John Sibert
> Emeritus Researcher, SOEST
> University of Hawaii at Manoa
> Honolulu HI (GMT-10)
> 808-294-3842
>
> Visit the ADMB project http://admb-project.org/
>
> On 02/13/2014 07:27 AM, dave fournier wrote:
>> On 14-02-12 12:29 PM, John Sibert wrote:
>>
>>
>> So at the time there was nice documentation for a feature that wasn't 
>> actually in the release.
>> I guess that makes my point.
>>
>>
>>> http://www.admb-project.org/documentation/api/gdbprintlib_8cpp.html
>>>
>>> John Sibert
>>> Emeritus Researcher, SOEST
>>> University of Hawaii at Manoa
>>> Honolulu HI (GMT-10)
>>> 808-294-3842
>>>
>>> Visit the ADMB project http://admb-project.org/
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2014 07:55 AM, dave fournier wrote:
>>>> On 14-02-10 10:39 AM, Ian Taylor - NOAA Federal wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps an example is needed.
>>>>
>>>> At the Seattle  workshop (and at the Honolulu workshop and at ...)
>>>> I showed how you could define a set of print functions call mp() 
>>>> (shorter is better for names here,
>>>> so that gdb users (included ddd) could use a command like
>>>>
>>>>    call mp(M)
>>>>
>>>> to print out say a vector or matrix in the debugger. Extend this to
>>>>
>>>>     call mpc(M,4)
>>>>
>>>> to  print out the 4'th column of a matrix M.
>>>>
>>>> all this could be extended to all types in an intuitive manner etc.
>>>>
>>>> To my knowledge nothing has been done with this.  I think it is a 
>>>> more useful idea than
>>>> puking out vast amounts of mindless documentation.
>>>>
>>>> Just a thought.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> I wasn't at the most recent Developer's workshop in Reykjavik, but 
>>>>> the report from that workshop 
>>>>> http://www.admb-project.org/developers/workshop/reykjavik-2013/meeting-report-1 
>>>>> seems relevant to this discussion. It says "Ongoing improvement of 
>>>>> ADMB documentation has been a long-standing priority area of the 
>>>>> ADMB project" (page 9), and lists "Add new Doxygen comments" among 
>>>>> the "Priorities for Documentation" along with things like "Update 
>>>>> manuals" and clean up the website (page 12).
>>>>>
>>>>> If the ADMB Developer's Workshop Report isn't a good source for 
>>>>> learning about the ADMB Projects's priorities, what is?
>>>>> -Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:07 PM, John Sibert <sibert at hawaii.edu 
>>>>> <mailto:sibert at hawaii.edu>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     I couldn't agree more. Documenting every function in every source
>>>>>     file would be a tragic waste of time and would not lead to a
>>>>>     better user experience. The emphasis on documentation may come
>>>>>     from some nameless NOAA bureaucrat ignorant of the fact that
>>>>>     there is already a lot API and other documentation. The ADMB API
>>>>>     documentation
>>>>> (http://www.admb-project.org/documentation/api/index.html) has a
>>>>>     nicely indexed list of commonly used functions on the "Function
>>>>>     Reference" tab. Classes and global functions are also indexed,
>>>>>     and there is a Search box.
>>>>>
>>>>>     The documentation seems to grow as more people contribute. All of
>>>>>     the contributed libraries are well documented. Steve Martel and
>>>>>     others have added Dox. Johnoel was trying to encourage other
>>>>>     developers to contribute as well. I tend to add Doxygen stuff
>>>>>     when a question pops up in an email or  when I get curious about
>>>>>     how something actually works. I would encourage others to do the
>>>>>     same.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     John Sibert
>>>>>     Emeritus Researcher, SOEST
>>>>>     University of Hawaii at Manoa
>>>>>     Honolulu HI (GMT-10)
>>>>>     808-294-3842 <tel:808-294-3842>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Visit the ADMB project http://admb-project.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 02/07/2014 06:13 PM, dave fournier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Well I know a bit about a lot of functions, but this seems
>>>>>         like make work to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Could you give me an example of a function for which more
>>>>>         documentation would
>>>>>         suddenly make the sun shine?
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         Developers mailing list
>>>>>         Developers at admb-project.org 
>>>>> <mailto:Developers at admb-project.org>
>>>>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     Developers mailing list
>>>>>     Developers at admb-project.org <mailto:Developers at admb-project.org>
>>>>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the Developers mailing list