[ADMB Users] Cubic splines

[Luis Ridao]

I wish to add that splines in version 10.1 (at least in my case) do not
work.
The same code used to run without problems on 10.0.

Best,
LRC

P.S: I have raised this issue previously on this list.

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Mark Payne <mpa at aqua.dtu.dk> wrote:

> Are Splines fulled implemented in both ADMB and ADMB-RE? I struct some
> problems with them in ADMB-RE, but haven't had time to look closer as
> yet....
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at admb-project.org on behalf of Ian Taylor
> Sent: Fri 5/20/2011 9:00 PM
> To: 'Mark Maunder'; users at admb-project.org
> Cc: 'Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva'; '???'; 'Simon Hoyle'
> Subject: Re: [ADMB Users] Cubic splines
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spline_interpolation to be
> informative.
>
>
> Also, inspired by your email, I've discovered that there's very useful
> information here:
>
> http://admb-project.org/documentation/api/group__cub__spline.html
>
> I just added that 2nd link to the FAQ item about splines, but obviously
> that's no substitute for some proper documentation in the user manual.
>
> -Ian
>
>
>
> From: Mark Maunder [mailto:mmaunder at iattc.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 11:40 AM
> To: users at admb-project.org
> Cc: 'Jim.Ianelli at noaa.gov'; Ian Taylor; '???'; 'Simon Hoyle'; Alexandre
> Aires-Da-Silva
> Subject: Cubic splines
>
>
>
> Does anyone have documentation on how cubic splines are implemented in
> ADMB?
> Or a simple description of how cubic splines are implemented in general.
>
>
>
> There are some examples on how to use them in ADMB
>
>
>
> http://admb-project.org/community/tutorials-and-examples/splines
>
>
>
>
> http://admb-project.org/community/tutorials-and-examples/splines/splines.tpl
> /view?searchterm=spline
>
>
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/admb-users/browse_thread/thread/e6ba196af3478
> dc0/1952dcc0dfbb6241?#1952dcc0dfbb6241
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Maunder
>
>
>
>
> Head of the Stock Assessment Program
>
>
> Inter-American  Tropical Tuna Commission
>
>
> President
>
> ADMB Foundation
>
>
>
> 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive
> La Jolla, CA, 92037-1508, USA
>
> Tel: (858) 546-7027
> Fax: (858) 546-7133
> mmaunder at iattc.org
>
> http://www.fisheriesstockassessment.com/TikiWiki/tiki-index.php?page=Mark+Ma
> under
>
>
>
> Visit the AD Model Builder project at
>   <http://admb-project.org/> http://admb-project.org/
>
>
>
> See the following website for information on fisheries stock assessment
>
> http://www.fisheriesstockassessment.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> From: users-bounces at admb-project.org [mailto:
> users-bounces at admb-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Campbell, Alex
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 6:15 PM
> To: users at admb-project.org
> Subject: Re: [ADMB Users] 10.1 ic > imax
>
>
>
> admb 10.0 and 9.1 on linux give me the same behaviour. so not a version
> thing. one day "soon" i'll find time to debug..
>
>
>
> convergence critieria is not necessarily the issue because that determines
> ultimate convergence, not the question of whether the process has hung
>
>
>
> grepping "ic > imax" points me to fmmtr1.cpp and newfmin.cpp but without
> debugging i'm not much wiser!
>
>
>
>  -alex
>
>  _____
>
> From: users-bounces at admb-project.org [mailto:
> users-bounces at admb-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Campbell, Alex
> Sent: Friday, 13 May 2011 4:33 PM
> To: users at admb-project.org
> Subject: [ADMB Users] 10.1 ic > imax
>
> Hi folks
>
> I've recently installed admb 10.1 on a 'real' system (SuSE Linux Enterprise
> Server 11 SP1, gcc 4.3) and I've noticed different behaviour vs my 32-bit
> admb 10.0 windoze setup. Specifically the ic > imax is minimum attained
> issue pops up on the 10.1 where it does not on the 10.0. Both installations
> give me the same parameter estimates, but obviously a) something is
> different, b) it appears to be worse in the newer version and c) it would
> be
> nice to know why. The first thing that came to mind is that the default
> value of the convergence criterion might have changed between 10.0 and 10.1
> but I ran the new system with -crit 1e-4 and same behaviour.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
>
>
> ********************************DISCLAIMER****************************
> The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages
> (which includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.  It is intended only for the use of the person or entity
> to which it is addressed.  If you are not the addressee any form of
> disclosure, copying, modification, distribution or any action taken
> or omitted in reliance on the information is unauthorised.  Opinions
> contained in the message(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> of the Queensland Government and its authorities.  If you received
> this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and delete it from your computer system network.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110523/9ce8aee6/attachment.html>