[ADMB Users] 10.4 for gcc 4.5 32 bit: incorrect binaries?

[Ian Taylor]

Other ADMB folks can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you can probably
get away with small differences in gcc version between what ADMB was built
for and what you're using to compile models.

Alternatively, you could build ADMB from the source code, in which case it
will exactly match your compiler. That process is documented in the README
file:  http://www.admb-project.org/svn/trunk/README.txt
-Ian

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:07 PM, J A Stephen Viggiano <
jasv at acolyte-color.com> wrote:

> On 06/26/2012 03:01 PM, Ian Taylor wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>> Perhaps you would be willing to try out the pre-release version of ADMB
>> 11 to see if this solves the problem. You can download it here:
>> http://www.admb-project.org/**downloads/ADMB-11prerelease<http://www.admb-project.org/downloads/ADMB-11prerelease>
>>
>> If you have time to give that a try, please let us know whether it fixes
>> the problem or not.
>>
>
> Dear Ian:
>
> Thank you for your rapid and constructive suggestion. The examples build
> fine, though I am concerned about the version of gcc (4.6 v 4.5 that I'm
> using). file identifies both tpl2cpp and tpl2rem from the pre-release
> version as 32-bit execution decks.
>
> Best regards and thank you again,
>
>
> --Steve
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120702/32d2af68/attachment.html>