[ADMB Users] 10.4 for gcc 4.5 32 bit: incorrect binaries?
ian.taylor at noaa.gov
Tue Jun 26 12:01:25 PDT 2012
Perhaps you would be willing to try out the pre-release version of ADMB 11
to see if this solves the problem. You can download it here:
If you have time to give that a try, please let us know whether it fixes
the problem or not.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:16 PM, J A Stephen Viggiano <
jasv at acolyte-color.com> wrote:
> Dear all:
> After downloading the binaries for my 32 bit intel system with gcc 4.5.1
> (verified with 'gcc -v'), followed the install procedure on your helpful
> and well-written page at http://www.admb-project.org/**
> documentation/installation/**admb-installation-linux<http://www.admb-project.org/documentation/installation/admb-installation-linux>(slightly modified to account for the fact I use tcsh, rather than bash).
> Running make from within the examples directory yielded the following:
> examples> make
> cd admb/simple;rm -f @.par @.std;admb simple;time ./simple
> *** Parsing: tpl2cpp simple
> /home/vigg/jail/admb-10.1-**linux-gcc4.5.2-32bit/bin/admb: line 42:
> /home/vigg/jail/admb-10.1-**linux-gcc4.5.2-32bit/bin/**tpl2cpp: cannot
> execute binary file
> Error: Failed to build executable.
> /bin/sh: ./simple: No such file or directory
> real 0m0.001s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.000s
> make: *** [simple] Error 127
> The "file" command identified tpl2cpp as a 64-bit ELF, rather than a
> examples> file ../bin/tpl2cpp
> ../bin/tpl2cpp: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped
> (The file "tpl2rem" identified similarly as 64-bit).
> Running things from bash yields the same unfortunate result (not
> surprising, as the execution deck appears to be for a 64-bit processor.
> Best regards,
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users