[ADMB Users] Build ADMB 11.1
bigA
jaguar.smart at gmail.com
Mon Mar 3 17:48:11 PST 2014
In general, fixing the paths and making necessary (or convenient)
symbolic links is better than asking people to edit their .bashrc .
Many bash users use their bashrc to configure their working
environment; admb is just one of countless things I use a shell for.
Once again, I have assembled the extant man page; do people think more
content is needed?
http://www.admb-project.org/developers/packaging/debian/man.pdf/view
Cheers!
Aaron
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, John Sibert <sibert at hawaii.edu> wrote:
> Why is it preferable to set a symbolic link than to set an environment
> variable in a .basrc file?
>
> John Sibert
> Emeritus Researcher, SOEST
> University of Hawaii at Manoa
> Honolulu HI (GMT-10)
> 808-294-3842
>
> Visit the ADMB project http://admb-project.org/
>
>
> On 03/03/2014 08:07 AM, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>>
>> Try
>>
>> http://www.admb-project.org/buildbot/documentation/QuickStartUnix.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Mark Payne <mpa at aqua.dtu.dk
>> <mailto:mpa at aqua.dtu.dk>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am having problems installingADMB 11.1 from the source on the
>> website ie
>>
>> http://admb-project.googlecode.com/files/admb-11.1.zip
>>
>> The source appears to build correctly, but fails when trying to
>> run the simple example. I have RTFM'd to the letter but it seems
>> that the instructions are incomplete and various items are not
>> getting picked up in the path.... (see below) What directories
>> does ADMB need to be in the path?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> admb simple.
>>
>> *** adlink -s
>> g++ -o "/home/mpayne/Misc/admb"/contrib/lib/libcontrib.a
>> "/home/mpayne/Misc/admb"/lib/libadmb.a
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o: In
>> function `_start':
>> (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>
>> Error: Could not build
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Fra:* users-bounces at admb-project.org
>> <mailto:users-bounces at admb-project.org>
>> [users-bounces at admb-project.org
>> <mailto:users-bounces at admb-project.org>] på vegne af Johnoel
>> Ancheta [johnoel at hawaii.edu <mailto:johnoel at hawaii.edu>]
>> *Sendt:* 21. februar 2014 21:03
>> *Til:* bigA
>> *Cc:* users at admb-project.org <mailto:users at admb-project.org>
>> *Emne:* Re: [ADMB Users] ADMB in standard package formats
>>
>>
>> The build process has changed. Check the link below.
>>
>> http://www.admb-project.org/buildbot/documentation/QuickStartUnix.html
>>
>> It should be simpler and easier for everyone, but may need some
>> fine tuning.
>>
>> Feedback from Barak Pearlmutter was used for the the changes.
>> Such as the
>> eliminating the need to set System Variables. Although, it will
>> still work if they
>> are set.
>>
>> If you would like to contribute man pages, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Johnoel
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:57 AM, bigA <jaguar.smart at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jaguar.smart at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I can work the man page; I have thus far been responsible for it.
>> I assume we don't want to write a 5460 line beast of a man page;
>> however any content that people want included in the man page
>> shown in
>> the Debian package.
>> Honestly, I think that focusing on the standard Linux build
>> process
>> and including the man page in the default build process will make
>> getting admb into the standard linux pipeline.
>> Barak Pearlmutter is probably a critical resource for this
>> activity;
>> however he cannot work on this alone. Has anyone looked at the
>> patches he has suggested? If the build process needs to be
>> cleaned up,
>> who within admb
>> is willing to work with us on it?
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Arni Magnusson
>> <arnima at hafro.is <mailto:arnima at hafro.is>> wrote:
>> > Our priority should be to release ADMB in standard package
>> formats: Debian,
>> > Gentoo, RPM, and Mac.
>> >
>> > This will make ADMB much more visible and accessible for
>> scientists in all
>> > disciplines. Package repositories are categorized, so ADMB
>> would be listed
>> > on autogenerated lists of scientific and statistical
>> software for Linux, for
>> > example. These lists are copied to Wikipedia, blogs,
>> newsletters, etc.
>> >
>> > Packaging means adapting the build procedure to Linux
>> standards (we may be
>> > there already), writing a short man page, and filling out a
>> basic template
>> > file for each package format. Please consider participating
>> in the ongoing
>> > effort:
>> >
>> > http://admb-project.org/developers/packaging
>> >
>> > Arni
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
>>
>> > http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
>>
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
>>
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
More information about the Users
mailing list