[ADMB Users] ADMB and MinGW-w64 users should update

[dave fournier]

On 11/06/2014 11:43 AM, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:

No they seemed to be about the same. Point was I could write the entire 
buffer
of  4294967304 bytes with one fwrite.  So that would fix the immediate 
problem.
> Did you find speed improvements?
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, dave fournier <davef at otter-rsch.com 
> <mailto:davef at otter-rsch.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 11/06/2014 11:23 AM, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>
>     I already did a bit of testing. test_write.cpp is the low level
>     one and test_write2.cpp uses fopen.
>
>
>>     Yes, this is a good idea.  I'll try changing write functions and
>>     compare speeds.
>>
>>     On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:59 AM, dave fournier
>>     <davef at otter-rsch.com <mailto:davef at otter-rsch.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         I did a bit of experimenting with writing large buffers to
>>         disk and it appears that
>>         replacing the low level  writes with fwrites and open with
>>         fopen etc .  permits one
>>         to write large buffers to disk in the code.
>>
>>         A more interesting solution might be to optionally  add
>>         another thread which can write
>>         portions of the buffer to disk as they become full.
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Users mailing list
>>         Users at admb-project.org <mailto:Users at admb-project.org>
>>         http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141106/4c96c660/attachment.html>