[ADMB Users] ADMB and MinGW-w64 users should update

Johnoel Ancheta johnoel at hawaii.edu
Thu Nov 6 11:43:41 PST 2014


Did you find speed improvements?

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, dave fournier <davef at otter-rsch.com> wrote:

>  On 11/06/2014 11:23 AM, Johnoel Ancheta wrote:
>
> I already did a bit of testing. test_write.cpp is the low level one and
> test_write2.cpp uses fopen.
>
>
>  Yes, this is a good idea.  I'll try changing write functions and compare
> speeds.
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:59 AM, dave fournier <davef at otter-rsch.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I did a bit of experimenting with writing large buffers to disk and it
>> appears that
>> replacing the low level  writes with fwrites and open with fopen etc .
>> permits one
>> to write large buffers to disk in the code.
>>
>> A more interesting solution might be to optionally  add another thread
>> which can write
>> portions of the buffer to disk as they become full.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at admb-project.org
>> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141106/0150367d/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list