[Developers] Link order of libraries

[Johnoel Ancheta]

Hi Arni,

The scripts have always need to be updated and use more
consistent file names.  There is a issue created for this

http://code.google.com/p/admb-project/issues/detail?id=56

Would you like to work on this issue together?

Johnoel

----- Original Message -----
From: Arni Magnusson <arnima at hafro.is>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:41 am
Subject: [Developers] Link order of libraries
To: developers at admb-project.org

> Great, Jason's trick solves my issue #1 from below. I have 
> updated 
> http://admb-project.org/community/builds (pending review) to 
> reflect this.
> 
> Does anyone know if this reverse order, ado32.lib adt32.lib 
> admod32.lib 
> df1b2o.lib, is in fact the best order for Borland? 
> [admb-9.0.202-win32-bcc5.5.1/bin/lnkadmb-re.bat]
> 
> Likewise, does anyone know if the repeated library sequence -
> ldf1b2stub 
> -ladmod -ladt -lado -ldf1b2stub -ladmod -ladt -lado is the best 
> sequence 
> for GCC? [admb-9.0.202-linux64-gcc4.2.4/bin/mygcco]
> 
> Is repeating necessary because the libraries are using functions 
> from each 
> other, both ways, as opposed to a specific library using 
> functions from a 
> more generic library?
> 
> I would like to contribute an improved set of user scripts, but 
> I don't 
> know the details of the code well enough to figure out the best 
> library 
> order.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Arni
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Grear.Jason at epamail.epa.gov wrote:
> 
> > I was having problems executing ADMB-RE examples using a 
> recent 
> > installation for the Borland compiler. The distribution comes 
> with a 
> > file called linkadmb-re.bat. The problem was solved by editing 
> this 
> > file, reversing the order of libaries linked.
> >
> > Jason Grear
> >
> > US EPA
> >
> > Narragansett, RI
> >
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Arni Magnusson wrote:
> 
> > Congratulations with the new release, everyone! I think the 
> release 
> > interval is just right. Here are four thoughts about the new 
> release:>
> > 1. I just uploaded an updated table of successful builds to 
> > http://admb-project.org/community/builds. Besides the cat-and-
> dux story, 
> > it highlights that the Borland release doesn't run random-
> effects 
> > models, at least not for me.
> >
> > 2. If we're on the same page 
> > (http://code.google.com/p/admb-project/issues/list), issue 58 
> is 
> > unnecessary once issue 59 has been fixed.
> >
> > 3. It would be helpful if "mymodel -help" would report the 
> correct 
> > version and year, instead of all versions reporting 9.0.0 and 
> 2008. The 
> > fixed strings are currently defined in nh99/model7.cpp.
> >
> > 4. Between revisions 158 and 204, the SVN tree has grown from 
> 23 MB to 
> > an enormous 203 MB. This takes a long time to transfer from 
> Hawaii to 
> > Iceland. The main culprit is the Windows tools 
> (admb/trunk/tools) with 
> > the GCC compiler at 114 MB and the GnuWin32 collection at 29 
> MB. Should 
> > we perhaps move them to a separate trunk so ADMB can be 
> checked out 
> > faster?
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Arni
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at admb-project.org
> http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090429/9b5240d8/attachment.html>