[ADMB Users] Problems with RE model, using FUNCTIONs for integration

Jeff Laake jefflaake at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 08:48:49 PST 2012

If the tpl file is written general enough modification isn't a big deal
because you can then just use the exe.  I'm still interested in learning
what mods are needed to get it to work. I wouldn't let this discourage you.
 Lots of good reasons to stick with admb.  If you can find an approximation
for the integral you could program it as well.


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Mark Wolters <kramsretlow at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeff (and Dave),
> Yes, I followed that discussion with great interest as it happened,
> and I tested out the .tpl file that was posted (even commenting out
> what I thought were the redundant initialization lines).  I got the
> same results that you did--the best I could get it to do was to
> compile with warnings. In any event I didn't feel that any solution
> requiring post-facto modification of the .cpp file was ready for prime
> time (read: for use by a novice like me). So I was hoping to keep it
> simple and find a workaround.
> At the moment I'm teetering on the edge of dropping this work entirely
> and moving on to something else.  I'm very attracted by the potential
> of ADMB, but not sure if I have the time to take the deep dive into it
> that seems required.
> Thanks for your input,
> Mark
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jeff Laake <jefflaake at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mark-
> >
> > I ran into this as well and you should look at the link that Dave posted.
> >
> > http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/2012-November/002014.html
> >  In his example he shows how to modify adromb and trapzd to call a
> specific
> > function h that is your function to integrate.
> >
> > Dave- The only part of that posting I didn't understand was:
> >
> > After tpl2rem need to get rid of extra
> > initialization lines near the bottom of the file.
> >
> > It was never clear to me what I needed to get rid of. I never got it to
> work
> > and switched to using a built-in function that worked for my case.
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at admb-project.org
> > http://lists.admb-project.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.admb-project.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121130/54837ad0/attachment.html>

More information about the Users mailing list